The US FCC Repeals Net Neutrality

By - 510 words

Language

Reading Level

Listen to Article

Image Credit World Wide Web.com

As had been widely anticipated, on Thursday, December 14, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted 3-2 to repeal the net neutrality regulations put in place by the agency two years ago. Why should you care? Because if critics are right, it may hinder your ability to access your favorite social media apps, play video games, or stream movies.

Introduced by President Obama in 2015, the net neutrality law required Internet Service Providers (ISPs) like AT&T and Comcast to treat all Internet data equally. This meant Comcast could not throttle the speed of competitors like Netflix to make its own streaming service more desirable. Large companies could also not gain an unfair advantage over smaller ones by paying additional fees to the service providers.

Image Credit: Imgur.com

Thursday’s decision, what the FCC refers to as “Restoring Internet Freedom,” removes the restrictions and gives service providers the freedom to prioritize their own sites, apps, and streaming services. The FCC believes the repeal will shift control of the Internet from the government to the providers, allowing for more innovation and economic stimulation. Commission Chairman Ajit Pai, who had always maintained the government overstepped its boundaries when they introduced the law in 2015, says, “We are helping consumers and promoting competition. Broadband providers will have more incentive to build networks, especially in underserved areas.”

Critics worry the reversal will enable ISPs to regulate internet speeds and control what consumers can access. They could potentially also censor content they do not wish customers to see. The biggest concern, however, is that broadband providers will introduce tiered internet pricing. For example, Comcast customers may have to pay more for streaming services from Netflix or Amazon, rather than Hulu, which the ISP partially owns. This means that affluent families would be able to access more services and faster Internet services than those that cannot afford to pay the higher prices.

Image Credit: Imgur.com

The service providers could also start charging companies a toll to make their content available. Should this happen, naysayers maintain it will provide an unfair advantage for larger companies like Google and Amazon and severely impact smaller businesses that cannot afford the extra cost.

Meanwhile, the ISPs are assuring consumers that they will not engage in any unfair practices. Also, the “Restoring Internet Freedom” act requires them to disclose if they do prioritize some sites or companies over others. This means their actions will be closely watched. Even if they do decide to discriminate, it will take some time before consumers feel any impact, given that the rules have to be approved by the White House Office of Management and Budget, which could take several months. The issue could also be tied up in courts for several years due to lawsuits filed by Attorney Generals from several states. Finally, there is the slim possibility that New York Senator Charles Schumer’s effort to get the repeal reversed under the Congressional Review Act will be approved. While no one knows what will happen next, one thing is for sure – the net neutrality debate is far from over, so stay tuned!

Resources: Newatlas.com, cnn.com, endgadget.com,wired.com

Cite Article
Learn Keywords in this Article
164 Comments
  • Rustyover 6 years
    So, just think on how not having net-neutrality could be fatal. Younger kiddos in 3rd to 6th grade would not be able to go on sites as much, the minimum age for minors getting jobs would have to be lowered so they could use the internet. You tubers would make way less money and digital artists could just be put out-of-job. Net Neutrality is amazing and should stay here.
    • Max Lanskyover 6 years
      I like net neutrality because why should I have to pay extra for video, e-mail, gaming, and social media when it could all be the same price. Also I think that companies shouldn't have to pay for better service, and some companies can't afford to pay more.
      • Boom5007over 6 years
        I think that net neutrality is smart because we should be able to pay the same price for good internet. Isp's should also not be able to block there competures.
        • Emma Bumpersover 6 years
          It is so unfair what if i am tyring to make mt company grow but i dont have any money?
          • Emma Bumpersover 6 years
            why dose their have to be a ISP?
            • MOMHEREover 6 years
              JUST THINK, IF I CAN'T AFFORD TO PAY FOR INTERNET, KIDS WILL EITHER DO ONE OF TWO THINGS; GET PART TIME JOB TO HELP PAY FOR IT OR START READING REAL PAPER BOUND BOOKS AND PLAYING TABLETOP BOARD GAMES, JUST LIKE THE GOOD OLD DAYS BACK IN THE EARLY 21ST CENTURY BEFORE COMPUTERS WERE ALITTLE BIT MORE AFFORDABLE.
              • DRAGON DA BOMBover 6 years
                This is REALLY unfair! I vote for keeping net neutrality! That's really unfair! And all for a bit more money!
                • KINGover 6 years
                  this was the not smart video ever
                  • SMOLFLYover 6 years
                    Good thing it still has to pass through Congress! I want free internet, Not this!😾🙀
                    • Luckyover 6 years
                      Thats insane!